Connect with us

Coin Market

DeFi as a solution in times of crisis

Published

on

Bitcoin helped pioneer this new era, but the future envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto requires our continued efforts.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Coin Market

5 red flags you’re being shilled: Don’t buy the hype

Published

on

By

What is shilling in crypto?

At its core, shilling is the act of artificially promoting a cryptocurrency or token, often with exaggerated claims, to increase its price or popularity. 

But what’s the goal? 

Hype it up, get others to buy in, and then cash out, leaving latecomers holding the bag.

Shilling can come from anyone: influencers, anonymous accounts or even high-profile figures with political or financial clout. The common thread is manipulation: It’s not about educating you or building real value but pumping hype for personal gain.

Unfortunately, the line between enthusiastic promotion and outright deception can be thin, and many fall victim without realizing it. That’s why it’s critical to learn how to spot the signs early.

5 red flags you’re being shilled

Beware of crypto red flags like overhyped promises, anonymous teams, influencer shills, missing products and FOMO tactics — if it smells like a scam, it probably is.

1. Overhyped promises 

You’ve probably seen posts that scream:

“100x potential!”“Guaranteed returns!”“This is your ticket to financial freedom!”

These are classic shill tactics. Real, credible projects don’t promise life-changing profits. Why? Because there are no guarantees in crypto or in any investment.

When a project leads with grandiose financial claims rather than actual product value or utility, it’s likely a ploy to stir FOMO and attract unsuspecting investors. The truth is, if something sounds too good to be true, it almost always is.

Remember: The bigger the promise, the bigger the red flag.

2. Anonymous or suspicious teams 

In crypto, anonymity isn’t always bad, but when you’re trusting people with your money, transparency matters.

It’s a major red flag when a project has:

No identifiable team membersFake names or aliasesStock photos on its websiteNo LinkedIn or professional history.

The simple rule is “No face, no funds.”

Scammers often hide behind anonymity because they know they’ll eventually vanish and there’ll be no one to hold accountable. Even worse, some use fabricated credentials or hire actors to pose as team members.

Before investing, check whether the founders or developers have any verifiable history. Do they have prior experience in blockchain or startups? Have they launched anything successful before?

3. Influencer spam and paid promotions 

One day, no one’s talking about a particular coin — the next, your feed is flooded with influencers hyping it up. Sound familiar?

This sudden burst of attention is often coordinated with a paid promotion campaign disguised as “genuine enthusiasm.”

Many influencers fail to disclose sponsorships, even though it’s required by law in many countries. The US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have cracked down on this in recent years.

Take, for example:

Kim Kardashian, who was fined $1.26 million in 2022 for promoting EthereumMax without proper disclosure.Floyd Mayweather Jr., who was sued for endorsing the same project at a paid event.BitBoy (Ben Armstrong), who faced legal action in multiple lawsuits for promoting scam tokens to his audience.

If you notice multiple influencers promoting the same project in a short time, especially without using labels like #ad or #sponsored, it’s a strong indicator of a shill campaign.

Don’t mistake volume for value. Hype doesn’t equal legitimacy.

4. No real product or roadmap

If you visit the project’s website, it looks sleek, maybe even impressive. But where’s the product? Where’s the code?

Shilled tokens often rely on flashy marketing but have no working application, no GitHub code and no actual use case. Everything is either “coming soon” or buried behind vague promises.

Ask yourself:

Can I use the platform or app today?Is there a white paper that makes sense?Do they have public repositories or open development?

If all you’re seeing is a landing page and a vague roadmap that’s been “coming soon” for months, that’s a major red flag.

5. Pressure tactics and FOMO 

Time pressure is a psychological weapon, and shillers know how to use it.

Watch out for lines such as:

“Presale ends in 2 hours!”“Only 1,000 spots left!”“If you don’t buy now, you’ll miss out forever!”

These tactics prey on your fear of missing out (FOMO) and push you into making impulsive decisions without research.

But crypto isn’t a sprint; it’s a long-term game. Anyone trying to rush you into buying likely has something to hide. Solid investments don’t need fake urgency.

Take a breath, step back, and ask yourself: Am I buying because I believe in this project or because I’m being manipulated?

Did you know? The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) secured a $128-million judgment against Ryan Mitchell Pope, Daniel Samuel Bishop and their company EmpiresX for operating a fraudulent forex and cryptocurrency investment scheme that defrauded over 12,500 victims.

Is shilling illegal in crypto? Can influencers be sued?

Shilling isn’t just unethical in many cases — it’s also illegal.

In the world of crypto, undisclosed promotions are a major legal risk. If someone is paid to promote a token or project but fails to reveal that financial connection, they could face fines, lawsuits or even criminal charges. This is especially true if the promoted token is later classified as a security under US law.

Regulators like the SEC, FTC and CFTC have all cracked down on this behavior. 

Their targets have included:

Influencers who failed to disclose paid promotionsPromoters who misled investors with false claimsIndividuals who ran pump-and-dump schemes using social media.

Francier Obando Pinillo, a pastor from Miami, was indicted on 26 fraud counts for running a crypto scam through “Solano Fi,” defrauding investors of millions from 2021 to 2023. He allegedly used his church, social media and false promises of 34.9% monthly returns to lure victims. The platform showed fake gains but blocked withdrawals, while funds were diverted for personal use. Pinillo was arraigned in Richland, Washington and faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

As crypto becomes more mainstream, expect stricter regulations and more consequences for shillers.

Did you know? Argentine President Javier Milei has dissolved the special task force investigating the LIBRA cryptocurrency scandal, a project he promoted in February 2025 that surged to a $4.5-billion valuation before crashing by over 97%. The task force, created by Milei himself, was disbanded via Decree 332/2025, citing that it had fulfilled its purpose. However, critics argue that no official findings were released, and judicial investigations into Milei and his associates continue.

Continue Reading

Coin Market

Coinbase hacker trolls ZachXBT onchain after $42.5M THORChain swap

Published

on

By

The hacker behind the data breach targeting Coinbase users mocked blockchain investigator ZachXBT with an onchain message following a major crypto swap.

On May 21, the hacker used Ethereum transaction input data to write “L bozo,” followed by a meme video of NBA player James Worthy smoking a cigar.

The message came after the attacker swapped about $42.5 million from Bitcoin (BTC) to Ether (ETH) via THORChain.

ZachXBT flagged the message on his Telegram channel, linking it to the same entity responsible for the Coinbase data breach affecting at least 69,400 users.

Coinbase hacker trolling ZachXBT. Source: ZachXBT.

On May 22, blockchain security firm PeckShield reported that the hacker had continued to move funds, swapping 8,697 ETH for 22 million Dai (DAI). A separate but closely linked address, which received 9,081 ETH via THORChain, also converted the assets into 23 million DAI.

Related: DOJ is investigating Coinbase data breach— Report

Coinbase hit with lawsuits after breach

The Coinbase breach, first reported in a filing with the Maine Attorney General’s office, occurred in December 2024 and was discovered on May 11. The stolen data includes names, home addresses and other personal information.

Following the disclosure, the attackers demanded a $20 million ransom in Bitcoin to prevent the release of the stolen data. Coinbase refused and instead offered a $20 million bounty for information leading to the identification of the hackers.

The company estimates a potential financial impact between $180 million and $400 million due to remediation costs and customer compensation.

Coinbase has also faced a wave of lawsuits following the revelation. At least six legal complaints were filed on May 15 and 16, with plaintiffs accusing the exchange of failing to implement adequate security measures and mishandling its response to the breach.

Related: Coinbase data leak could put users in physical danger: TechCrunch founder

THORChain under scrutiny for criminal use

The Coinbase hacker’s use of THORChain to swap $42.5 million worth of Bitcoin into Ether comes as the protocol faces growing scrutiny over its role in facilitating illicit transactions.

In March, the platform came under fire after its swap volume surged following the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. The protocol generated over $5 million in revenue after processing $5.4 billion in swap volume, with over $1 billion moved in a single day.

Blockchain security firms identified North Korea’s Lazarus Group as the main suspect, using THORChain to launder a significant portion of the stolen funds.

Source: Lookonchain

The controversy intensified when a THORChain developer, known as “Pluto,” resigned after a vote to block transactions linked to Lazarus was overturned.

Magazine: TradFi is building Ethereum L2s to tokenize trillions in RWAs: Inside story

Continue Reading

Coin Market

Feds charge Amalgam founder with stealing $1M via ‘sham’ blockchain

Published

on

By

A US grand jury has indicted the founder of blockchain startup Amalgam Capital Ventures over allegations he defrauded investors out of over $1 million with a fake blockchain.

Jeremy Jordan-Jones was arrested and indicted on May 21 and charged with wire fraud, securities fraud, making false statements to a bank, and aggravated identity theft, the Department of Justice said on May 21.  

Manhattan US Attorney Jay Clayton claimed Jordan-Jones “touted his company as a groundbreaking blockchain startup,” but alleged that, in reality, the “company was a sham, and investors’ funds were siphoned off to bankroll his lavish lifestyle.”

FBI Assistant Director Christopher Raia alleged that Jordan-Jones defrauded investors of more than 1 million dollars through “misrepresentations of his purported company’s capabilities, partnerships, and investment intentions.”

Raia claimed the Amalgam founder’s “blatant lies” funded his personal lifestyle at the expense of unknowing victims.

An excerpt from the indictment of Jeremy Jordan-Jones. Source: US Department of Justice

According to an indictment filed in a Manhattan federal court, from January 2021 to November 2022, Jordan-Jones deceived investors and financial institutions using fabricated documents, fake sports partnerships, and misleading claims, ultimately misappropriating over $1 million for personal use.

Related: Ex-Cred execs plead guilty to wire fraud over $150M crypto collapse

Amalgam claimed to offer point-of-sale systems and blockchain-based payment and security solutions, the filing states.

The indictment alleged the firm had “no operable products, few, if any, customers, and zero legitimate business partnerships.”

The filing alleged that instead of channeling the funds into tech development and crypto exchange listings as promised, Jordan-Jones spent the money on luxury vehicles, high-end vacations, clothing and fancy restaurants in Miami. 

Charges carry decades in prison

Jordan-Jones was also accused of submitting a fake bank statement claiming Amalgam held over $18 million in order to secure a company credit card, but prosecutors claimed there were no funds in the bank account and it had been closed in late 2021. 

Wire fraud and security fraud carry potential penalties of up to 20 years in prison per count, while making false statements to a bank carries up to 30 years.

Jordan-Jones was also charged with one count of aggravated identity theft, which carries a mandatory sentence of two years in prison.

The government is seeking forfeiture of any property or money traceable to the fraud, including substitute assets if the original funds are unavailable.

Magazine: Arthur Hayes $1M Bitcoin tip, altcoins ‘powerful rally’ looms: Hodler’s Digest

Continue Reading

Trending