Connect with us

Coin Market

Ethereum devs prepare final Pectra test before mainnet launch

Published

on

Ethereum developers are under pressure as the Pectra upgrade rolls out to a new testnet following several unexpected issues that have delayed its deployment to the mainnet.

The Pectra upgrade, which was expected to hit the Ethereum mainnet in March, was deployed into the network’s Holesky testnet on Feb. 24. However, the upgrade failed to finalize on the network, prompting developers to investigate and address the causes. 

On March 5, the update was rolled out to the Sepolia testnet. However, developers again encountered errors, which were made worse by an unknown attacker who used an “edge case” to cause the mining of empty blocks

To better prepare for the upgrade, Ethereum core developers created a new testnet called “Hoodi.”

Ethereum developers “exhausted” from Pectra preparations

Hoodi was launched on March 17, and the Pectra upgrade will roll out on Hoodi on March 26. If the upgrade runs smoothly, Pectra may hit the mainnet as early as April 25. 

In an interview with Cointelegraph’s Felix Ng, Ethereum Foundation’s protocol support team member Nixo Rokish said developers have been through a lot while preparing for the Pectra upgrade. Rokish told Cointelegraph: 

“I think that people are nervous because we just had two testnets in a row basically have really unexpected issues that were not fundamentally related to how it would have gone on mainnet.”

Rokish added that exhaustion is setting in, especially for the consensus layer developers, as Hoodi marks the third attempt to test Pectra.

“I think the consensus layer devs especially, but also like somewhat the execution layer devs are exhausted right now,” Rokish told Cointelegraph. 

Related: Ethereum devs agree to stop forking around and accelerate the roadmap

Ethereum devs solved what needed to be solved

According to Rokish, the Holesky testnet failed in part because it had never been tested with such a small validator set on the canonical chain.

“As decentralized as Holesky is, it has never been tested at so few validators on the canonical chain,” she said. 

When about 10% was left on the canonical chain, the validators overloaded their RAM and memory as they kept the state for 90% of validators on the non-canonical chain. 

Rokish said they had never seen this before. “And so the consensus layer devs all of a sudden had this problem where they had to change a bunch of things, and I think that that was really tiring for them,” she said. 

Despite the recent testnet challenges, Ethereum’s broader development continues to show progress.

On March 13, 2024, the network rolled out the Dencun upgrade, which implemented many changes in the blockchain. 

High gas fees, which were once a huge problem for the network, have become a thing of the past. A year after its Dencun upgrade, Ethereum’s gas fees dropped by 95%. On March 23, average gas prices reached historic lows of 0.28 gwei.

Magazine: What are native rollups? Full guide to Ethereum’s latest innovation

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Coin Market

Trump-linked crypto ventures may complicate US stablecoin policy

Published

on

By

A US dollar-pegged stablecoin launched by a cryptocurrency platform tied to US President Donald Trump’s family could complicate ongoing bipartisan efforts to pass stablecoin legislation in Congress, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

The Trump-linked World Liberty Financial (WLFI) crypto platform launched the World Liberty Financial USD (USD1) US dollar-pegged stablecoin in early March, prompting concerns over potential conflicts of interest.

Despite political pushback from Democratic Party lawmakers, WLFI’s stablecoin plans are in line with the current US stablecoin legislation, according to Anastasija Plotnikova, co-founder and CEO of blockchain regulatory firm Fideum.

“The planned backing, audits, qualified custody, public blockchains and no native yield-bearing — all these elements are well in line with the GENIUS and STABLE acts,” she said in an interview with Cointelegraph.

“I would argue that this is a direct expression of support to the US-based stablecoins, and in any case, the stablecoin issuer is subject to the authorization of OCC, state regulators and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve,” she added.

Related: Stablecoins, tokenized assets gain as Trump tariffs loom

The launch comes as two major stablecoin bills move through Congress.

The STABLE Act, introduced on Feb. 6, aims to create a clear regulatory framework for dollar-denominated payment stablecoins. It focuses on transparency and consumer protection and enables issuers to choose between federal and state oversight.

Source: STABLE Act

The GENIUS Act, short for Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, would establish collateralization guidelines for stablecoin issuers while requiring full compliance with Anti-Money Laundering laws. The act recently passed the Senate Banking Committee by a vote of 18–6.

Related: Trump turned crypto from ‘oppressed industry’ to ‘centerpiece’ of US strategy

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin is “throwing a wrench into bipartisan efforts”

While some see WLFI’s stablecoin as a positive signal for crypto adoption, others fear it may complicate the passage of current legislation, politicizing it in the process.

“Trump’s new US dollar-pegged stablecoin, USD1, is throwing a wrench into bipartisan efforts to pass stablecoin legislation, possibly something like the GENIUS Act,” according to Dmitrij Radin, the founder of Zekret and chief technology officer of Fideum.

“With the Trump family holding a major stake and revenue share, critics like Senator [Elizabeth] Warren and Representative [Jim] Himes are calling out potential conflicts of interest,” Radin told Cointelegraph, adding:

“The concern would be that any law could be seen as financially benefiting Trump, making some lawmakers hesitant. While the bill could still pass, this twist might delay it or force stricter rules to keep it neutral.”

While stablecoins appear ready for mainstream adoption, “political drama” may push innovation offshore if regulators become overly restrictive, Radin said, adding that banks and the Federal Reserve are still “pushing back” against stablecoin adoption.

Meanwhile, crypto industry professionals have urged US lawmakers to create more regulatory clarity around stablecoins and crypto banking relationships before legislators switch their focus to crypto tax laws.

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Continue Reading

Coin Market

Crypto ETP outflows, explained — What investors need to know

Published

on

By

What are crypto ETP outflows?

Crypto ETPs give exposure to digital assets via traditional financial instruments. When more money exits these products rather than entering them, it is known as an “outflow” rather than an “inflow” — i.e., more people are selling than buying. 

Crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) hold crypto assets as their underlying commodity. The goal is for them to provide an exchange-traded investment for investors who want exposure to crypto without directly buying the digital assets. 

Many investors, particularly institutions, prefer this method, as it opens up crypto investing within traditional financial instruments. There is no need to venture into unregulated market areas or take responsibility for the security and safety of crypto assets. 

There are several types of crypto ETPs available, including exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). Most famously, Bitcoin ETFs were approved and began trading in January 2024. These crypto ETPs are widely traded and often account for the majority of trading volumes — both inflows and outflows. 

If you’ve been following the price action of cryptocurrency like Bitcoin (BTC), then you’ll likely have seen stories about crypto ETP outflows. 

So, what are crypto ETP outflows? 

This occurs when money flows out of these investment products, indicating that the market is eager to sell off positions. The reasons for this can vary, including profit-taking, negative market sentiment or risk adjustment.

Crypto ETP investment trends

These crypto fund outflows can be large and drive serious volatility in the markets. For example, in March 2025, global crypto products shed $1.7 billion over the course of a week. This compounded outflow totals $6.4 billion in the trailing five weeks. During this time, 17 consecutive days of outflows were recorded, causing the longest streak since records began in 2015. 

As an investor, understanding ETP flow offers insight into institutional investor sentiment. This can often precede the wider market movements in the coming days and weeks. Outflows can signal warning signs of a changing market dynamic. In the case of record-breaking outflows, it could point to a shift in how institutional money is viewing risk within the crypto markets. 

Factors driving crypto ETP outflows

ETP outflows are driven by a mix of factors, which include economic conditions, industry concerns, regulation, market cycles and more, that can be used to spot upcoming market moves. 

So, if ETP flows can be a useful way to gauge sentiment changes in the market, then it is critical to understand what drives these flows. Crypto markets are fickle and can move quickly on news cycles. Adding to this, there are several other common factors that correlate to driving ETP outflows:

Macroeconomic headwinds: Economic uncertainty and bad news can lead to money flooding out of risky assets. This often includes US Federal Reserve policy concerns, inflation data and interest rate uncertainty. Security concerns: Hiccups within the industry can make investors nervous, especially during news of fraud and hacks such as the $1.5-billion Bybit hack in early 2025.Regulation development: Shifting government positions on crypto can lead to money flows. Particularly, anti-crypto political moves and taxation can spook ETP investors. Market cycles: After significant market gains, pullbacks start to occur as institutions enter a profit-taking phase to book in their profits. This selling action draws money out of the market. Institutional sentiment: Major financial institutions make up a significant chunk of the market. If they decide to reassess their crypto allocation, outflows can begin as strategies move to less risky assets. Technical indicators: Many investors watch technical indicators closely. If key support levels are broken on major cryptocurrencies, selling pressure intensifies quickly.

Often, multiple factors, as explained above, can create a perfect storm for retreating investor sentiment and lead to an unprecedented scale of outflows. Understanding these factors can help you to spot the difference between normal volatility and fundamental market shifts.

Impact of ETP outflows on crypto markets

Crypto ETP outflows are signals of significant sentiment shifts, which in turn continue to put downward pricing pressure on crypto markets. 

Prolonged outflow streaks are cause for concern for crypto investors, as they indicate a critical shift in investor sentiment for cryptocurrency. Long streaks suggest that market conditions have become particularly challenging. Generally, outflows start with Bitcoin ETPs, as it is the most well-known and largest cryptocurrency. This can then spread to ETPs for other assets like Ether (ETH) before creating a loss of confidence in the whole crypto market. 

During these periods, you’ll quickly see direct price pressure on crypto assets trickle down the markets. During large ETP outflows, cryptocurrency experiences significant price corrections, which can hit 20% or more in a matter of weeks. 

Liquidity is also affected, with total assets under management (AUM) dropping by billions of dollars. With more sellers than buyers in the market, the reduced liquidity makes selling harder for many crypto assets, further adding to the downward price pressures. 

Market sentiment quickly becomes contagious as negativity spreads from institutions to retail investors. When this happens, even the strongest growth streaks can be terminated as excitable bull runs halt.

ETP outflow indicators

Knowing the key indicators can help provide early warning signals for investors looking to anticipate big market moves. 

The concentration of flows in specific products and understanding regional discrepancies can create targeted monitoring to spot investment opportunities. Indicators favored by investors include:

Volume: Unusual spikes in ETP trading volumes usually precede large outflow events. Typically, this spike can signal something important about investor sentiment or market conditions. For instance, a large uptick in volume may indicate that investors are preparing for or responding to news, market movements or shifts in sentiment.Premium/discount shifts: Premiums and discounts refer to the difference between the price at which an ETP is trading in the market and its actual net asset value (NAV), which is the value of the assets held. Shifts in premium/discount can give insight into market sentiment or potential future price movements. For instance, if an ETP that usually trades at a premium suddenly starts trading at a discount, it could signal waning investor confidence in the underlying assets or broader market concerns.Leading product indicators: Leading product indicators are products or assets that tend to signal broader market trends. For example, a movement in the BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), a dominant Bitcoin ETF, can indicate growing institutional interest in Bitcoin, which may signal future market growth. These products often lead the way for similar assets or broader market sectors. The performance of industry-leading products is closely monitored by investors, as their price fluctuations can act as a barometer for upcoming trends in both crypto and traditional markets, helping predict broader market shifts.Institutional holdings reports: Institutional holdings refer to the positions held by large investment entities like mutual funds, pension funds and hedge funds. These firms often hold large quantities of assets or securities, and their decisions can have a significant impact on the market. A change in major institutional positions could indicate a shift in how these large players view the market or specific assets. For example, if a large institutional investor starts reducing its position in a particular stock or ETP, it might signal that the investor believes the asset’s price is going to decrease or that they are adjusting their portfolio based on broader economic factors.Flow momentum indicators: Flow momentum indicators track the rate at which capital flows in or out of a market or asset. An acceleration in outflows typically signals panic or growing market uncertainty as investors rush to withdraw funds. Conversely, the deceleration of outflows suggests a stabilization in sentiment, as fears may subside or investors look to reenter the market. Monitoring these indicators helps investors assess the intensity of market sentiment over short (days/weeks) and medium (months) terms, offering insights into whether the market is facing a temporary dip or a more prolonged downturn.Regional flow discrepancies: Regional flow discrepancies refer to the varying capital outflow patterns across different geographic regions. During market sell-offs, US-based investors often lead the way in pulling funds out of the market due to their significant market share and risk appetite. This can result in more substantial outflows in US markets compared to other regions. However, these discrepancies can also present opportunities for international investors, especially when one region shows resilience while others are panicking. Tracking regional trends is crucial for understanding the global dynamics that drive market movements and investor sentiment.Cross-asset correlations: Cross-asset correlations examine how different asset classes, like cryptocurrencies and traditional financial markets, move in relation to one another. Typically, high-risk assets like Bitcoin often show a correlation with tech stocks or other volatile assets. When traditional markets experience turbulence, such as a downturn in equities, crypto markets may also dip as investors seek safety. Conversely, during periods of growth in traditional markets, cryptocurrencies might see inflows as investors look for higher returns. Understanding these correlations enables investors to make more informed decisions by anticipating how crypto markets will react to broader economic conditions.

Crypto ETP inflows and outflows: 2024–Q1 2025 trends and insights

In 2024, crypto ETPs saw record inflows of $44.2 billion, led by Bitcoin and Ether products, despite minor year-end outflows. However, 2025 experienced a sharp reversal, with significant outflows starting in February, resulting in $2.55 billion in net inflows by March 10.

Here are the key highlights of 2024–2025 crypto ETP flows:

2024 net inflows: According to CoinShares, the total net inflows for 2024 reached $44.2 billion, a 320% increase from the previous record of $10.5 billion set in 2021.Bitcoin ETPs inflows: Bitcoin ETPs alone saw $38 billion in inflows, accounting for 29% of Bitcoin’s total AUM of $130 billion.Ether ETPs inflows: Ether-based ETPs also performed well, with late 2024 momentum pushing annual inflows to $4.8 billion, representing 26% of ETH’s $18.6 billion AUM.Minor outflows in 2024: Despite the overall positive net inflows, there were periods of outflows, notably in the last trading week of 2024, which saw $75 million in net outflows, as reported on Jan. 6, 2025.Overall positive net inflows in 2024: These outflows were minor compared to the year’s inflows, and overall, 2024 had no significant net outflows, with the net flow being positive at $44.2 billion.Strong start to 2025: The year 2025 started strongly, with the first three days of January 2025 seeing $585 million in inflows.2025 net inflows by Feb. 10: By Feb. 10, 2025, year-to-date net inflows reached $7.3 billion, with five consecutive weeks of inflows, including a notable week ending Feb. 10 with $1.3 billion in inflows, where Ether ETPs saw $793 million in inflows, outpacing Bitcoin.Reversal of inflows starting Feb. 17, 2025: However, there was a sharp reversal starting from the week ending Feb. 17, 2025, with the first significant weekly net outflows of $415 million, according to CoinShares.End of 19-week inflow streak: This marked the end of a 19-week inflow streak post-US election, amassing $29.4 billion, far surpassing the $16 billion in the first 19 weeks of US spot ETF launches in 2024.Continued outflows in late Feb. 2025: The outflows continued, with the week ending Feb. 24, 2025, seeing $508 million in Bitcoin outflows, and the week ending March 3, 2025, recording the largest weekly outflows on record at $2.9 billion, bringing the three-week total to $3.8 billion.March 2025 outflows: The week ending March 10, 2025, saw another $876 million in outflows, bringing the total outflows over these four weeks to $4.75 billion. Starting the week of March 17, cryptocurrency ETPs saw liquidations accelerate, with $1.7 billion in outflows recorded. This brought the total outflows over the past five weeks to $6.4 billion, according to CoinShares’ report. Crypto ETP inflows surge; AUM declines (as of March 31): Global crypto ETPs saw $226 million in inflows for the week ending March 30, following $644 million the week before. Despite this two-week positive trend after a five-week outflow streak, total AUM dropped below $134 million by March 28. Altcoins recorded $33 million in inflows after four weeks of outflows totaling $1.7 billion.

Future of crypto ETPs

Despite worryingly large outflow events in 2025, the continuing growth in new ETP varieties hitting the market indicates a continued financial interest in the space.

Especially considering the longer-term growth trend of crypto AUM, the future of crypto ETPs as a strong investment vehicle and market driver is strong. Large outflows can be concerning for investors in the short term, but even severe pullbacks of 20%–30% can be recovered during a larger market cycle. In fact, many investors believe these pullbacks are healthy during periods of growth as investors take profits and consolidate market positions.

Regulatory evolution appears positive, particularly in the US, with President Donald Trump being pro-crypto. He’s even signed executive orders to try and improve approaches to crypto regulation and form a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and digital asset stockpile

New crypto ETPs are frequently being filed by financial institutions eager to broaden their offerings for investors. In addition to Bitcoin and Ether products, Solana and XRP ETPs have gained significant attention following their approval and launch. These new products have even seen inflows despite downturns in Bitcoin and Ether ETPs.

As the crypto market continues to evolve, the launch of new ETPs is likely to drive further innovation and attract a broader range of investors. With increasing regulatory clarity and growing institutional interest, future offerings may expand to include other promising cryptocurrencies. 

As a result, you can expect continued diversification in the crypto ETP space, with potential for increased inflows and new market opportunities, even amid fluctuations in established assets like BTC and ETH.

Continue Reading

Coin Market

Crypto hacks top $1.6B in Q1 2025 — PeckShield

Published

on

By

Hackers stole more than $1.63 billion in cryptocurrency during the first quarter of 2025, with the Bybit exploit accounting for more than 92% of total losses, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.

PeckShield reported that over $87 million in crypto was lost to hacks in January, while February saw a dramatic spike to $1.53 billion, largely due to the Bybit attack. That incident was one of the largest crypto thefts to date.

In addition to the Bybit hack, other attacks in February caused $126 million in losses. This included a $50-million exploit targeting Infini, a $9.5-million hack on zkLend and an $8.5-million loss from Ionic.  

Hack-related losses dropped significantly in March, decreasing by 97% from February. PeckShield reported only $33 million in crypto assets were stolen last month. Some funds were even recovered, helping offset damage to users and protocols.

Crypto hacks saw a 131% year-over-year increase

According to PeckShield, the first quarter of 2025 saw more than 60 crypto hacks. The blockchain security firm said the $1.63 billion loss in Q1 2025 represented a 131% year-over-year increase from the first quarter of 2024, when losses reached $706 million.

The largest incident in March was a $13 million exploit involving decentralized finance protocol Abracadabra.Money. PeckShield said the attacker drained 6,260 Ether (ETH) from the protocol on March 25.

Crypto hack losses in March. Source: PeckShield

Related: North Korean crypto attacks rising in sophistication, actors — Paradigm

The second-biggest incident during the month was an $8.4-million hack on the real-world asset (RWA) restaking protocol Zoth. 

On March 21, security firm Cyvers flagged a suspicious Zoth transaction, an attacker withdrawing $8.4 million from the protocol’s wallets. The assets were converted into a stablecoin and transferred to another address. 

While millions were lost in March, some cases saw assets being returned. On March 7, a crypto hacker who stole $5 million from decentralized exchange (DEX) 1inch returned 90% of the funds

After a smart contract vulnerability was exploited, the DEX offered a 10% bounty to the attacker, worth $500,000, in exchange for returning the rest of the crypto assets. The hacker obliged and sent back $4.5 million to 1inch. 

Magazine: Mystery celeb memecoin scam factory, HK firm dumps Bitcoin: Asia Express

Continue Reading

Trending