Connect with us

Technology

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Market size is set to grow by USD 3.92 billion from 2024-2028, Harmful usage of lead batteries leads to higher adoption of Li-S batteries boost the market, Technavio

Published

on

NEW YORK, July 4, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — The global lithium-sulfur battery market size is estimated to grow by USD 3.92 billion from 2024-2028, according to Technavio. The market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of  44.97%  during the forecast period. Harmful usage of lead batteries leads to higher adoption of li-s batteries is driving market growth, with a trend towards use of nanotechnology in batteries. However, increasing competition from fuel cell solutions  poses a challenge. Key market players include Bettergy Corp., CIC energiGUNE, Gelion Technologies Pty Ltd., Giner Inc., Guang Dong Fullriver Industry Co. Ltd., Ilika, Iolitec Ionic Liquids Technologies GmbH, LG Chem Ltd., Li-S Energy Ltd., Lyten Inc., Merck KGaA, NexTech Batteries, Poly Plus Battery Co., Rechargion Energy Pvt. Ltd., Shenzhen Uscender Industrial Co. Ltd., Sion Power Corp., Solid State PLC, TRU Group Inc., VTC Power Co. Ltd., and Zeta Energy LLC.

Get a detailed analysis on regions, market segments, customer landscape, and companies- View the snapshot of this report

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Market Scope

Report Coverage

Details

Base year

2023

Historic period

2018 – 2022

Forecast period

2024-2028

Growth momentum & CAGR

Accelerate at a CAGR of 44.97%

Market growth 2024-2028

USD 3921.9 million

Market structure

Fragmented

YoY growth 2022-2023 (%)

34.37

Regional analysis

North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa

Performing market contribution

Europe at 50%

Key countries

US, Germany, Canada, China, and India

Key companies profiled

Bettergy Corp., CIC energiGUNE, Gelion Technologies Pty Ltd., Giner Inc., Guang Dong Fullriver Industry Co. Ltd., Ilika, Iolitec Ionic Liquids Technologies GmbH, LG Chem Ltd., Li-S Energy Ltd., Lyten Inc., Merck KGaA, NexTech Batteries, Poly Plus Battery Co., Rechargion Energy Pvt. Ltd., Shenzhen Uscender Industrial Co. Ltd., Sion Power Corp., Solid State PLC, TRU Group Inc., VTC Power Co. Ltd., and Zeta Energy LLC

Market Driver

The global nanotechnology-enabled Lithium-Sulfur battery market is poised for growth due to the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), plug-in hybrid EVs, and hybrid EVs, as well as the focus on renewable energy sources. Since 2015, vendors have been developing nanostructured electrodes and electrolytes in Li-S batteries to enhance energy efficiency. These nanotechnology-enabled batteries are expected to offer energy densities three times higher than traditional Lithium-ion batteries. Notable innovations include the use of a silicon-carbon composite anode and a nanostructured lithium sulfide-carbon composite cathode. Ongoing projects, such as the Lithium-Sulfur Super battery Exploiting Nanotechnology (LISSEN) study, are further driving market growth during the forecast period. 

Lithium-sulfur batteries are gaining attention as the next big thing in clean energy solutions due to their energy-dense characteristics. This battery technology uses elemental sulfur as the cathode and lithium as the anode. However, challenges such as electrolyte stability, electrode architecture, and the polysulfide shuttle effect need to be addressed. Fossil fuels may soon face competition from these lightweight cells, which can power electric vehicles and portable electronics. Manufacturing challenges include lithium dendrite formation, material interactions, and production techniques. Lithium-ion manufacturing facilities are exploring solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with solid electrolyte systems to overcome these issues. The power sector and large-scale energy storage are also potential markets for this technology due to its low-cost characteristics. Safety measures are crucial to ensure the safe production and use of these batteries. The EV market and EV technology stand to benefit significantly from this advancement. Aerospace, including satellites, is another sector that can benefit from the high power output of lithium-sulfur batteries. The anode and cathode in these batteries are crucial components, and improving their conductivity and volume expansion properties can lead to better battery performance. In summary, lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising clean energy solution for various industries, including electric vehicles, portable electronics, and the power sector. Addressing manufacturing challenges and ensuring safety measures are essential to bring this technology to the market. The potential benefits of this technology are significant, from reducing reliance on fossil fuels to powering the next generation of electric cars and aerospace technology. 

Research report provides comprehensive data on impact of trend. For more details- Download a Sample Report

Market Challenges

Fuel cells and Lithium-Sulfur batteries are two distinct technologies used to generate electricity. Fuel cells produce power through electrochemical reactions between hydrogen and oxygen, resulting in water and released electrons. These electrons flow through an external circuit to generate power. Fuel cells have a standard design with two electrodes separated by an electrolyte, enabling charged particles to move. Drones have gained popularity but face a limitation of short flight times. To overcome this challenge, manufacturers are exploring fuel cells as an alternative power source. Hydrogen, as a fuel for fuel cells, offers a higher energy density and longer runtime compared to Lithium-Sulfur batteries. Fuel cells can be refilled in minutes, while batteries take an hour to recharge. The global fuel cell market is growing due to its application in automotive and energy storage sectors, posing a hurdle for the expansion of the Lithium-Sulfur battery market during the forecast period.The Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) battery market is gaining attention due to its potential to offer high energy density, making it suitable for power cell applications in various industries. However, challenges persist, such as the melting of the sulfur electrode at high temperatures. A German battery startup, Theron, is working on interlayers to address this issue. Li-S batteries have advantages over prior generations, including lower environmental impact and compatibility with renewable energy sources. They are being explored for use in drones, defence sector, personalized power, aviation, and outer space vehicles. The challenges of Li-S batteries include their low energy density and the need for solid-state batteries for commercialization. The defence sector, drone technology companies like DroneShield, and the aviation industry are exploring Li-S batteries for their applications. The coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the need for clean electricity and energy storage solutions, making Li-S batteries a promising option for powering portable electronic devices and charging stations. Li-S batteries use lithium ions and sulfur to store energy, with electrons flowing between the cathode (sulfur) and anode (lithium ions) during charging and discharging. Despite the challenges, the advantages of Li-S batteries make them a promising alternative to primary batteries and conventional fuels for various applications, including aircraft-installed equipment and renewable energy installations.

For more insights on driver and challenges – Request a sample report!

Segment Overview 

This lithium-sulfur battery market report extensively covers market segmentation by  

Type 1.1 High energy density1.2 Low energy densityEnd-user 2.1 Aviation2.2 Automotive2.3 OthersGeography 3.1 North America3.2 Europe3.3 APAC3.4 South America3.5 Middle East and Africa

1.1 High energy density-  Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are high-energy-density batteries that offer longer battery run time or a smaller footprint with the same energy output compared to batteries with lower energy density. This property makes them popular in electric vehicles (EVs), which require long driving ranges. LSBs have gained attention due to sulfur’s abundant availability, low cost, environmental friendliness, high specific capacity, and energy density. The European Commission estimates that LSBs will be used in EVs during the forecast period, making the high-energy-density segment of the LSB market a focus for growth.

For more information on market segmentation with geographical analysis including forecast (2024-2028) and historic data (2017-2021) – Download a Sample Report

Research Analysis

Lithium-sulfur batteries represent a promising advancement in clean energy solutions, offering higher energy density compared to traditional lithium-ion batteries. This next-generation battery chemistry utilizes lithium as an anode and sulfur as a cathode. However, challenges remain, including electrolyte stability, electrode architecture, and the polysulfide shuttle effect. These issues can lead to lithium dendrite formation and degradation of battery performance. Despite these hurdles, lithium-sulfur batteries hold significant potential for various applications, including aerospace, consumer electronics, electric cars, large-scale storage, and renewable energy installations. They can power satellites, high-altitude aircraft, outer space vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, and even primary batteries for specific use cases. The high energy density and potential for long cycle life make lithium-sulfur batteries an intriguing alternative to lithium-ion batteries for various sectors, contributing to the ongoing advancement of battery technology.

Market Research Overview

Lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising clean energy solution for the future, offering high energy density and low-cost characteristics. These batteries utilize lithium as an anode and elemental sulfur as a cathode, separated by an electrolyte. However, challenges such as electrolyte stability, electrode architecture, and the polysulfide shuttle effect can hinder their widespread adoption. Fossil fuels continue to dominate the energy sector, but lithium-sulfur batteries have the potential to revolutionize large-scale energy storage for electric vehicles (EVs), portable electronics, and even aerospace. Manufacturing challenges include managing material interactions, production techniques, and ensuring safety measures. Solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries, which use a solid electrolyte system instead of liquid electrolytes, are being explored to mitigate some of these challenges. Lithium-sulfur batteries have advantages over lithium-ion batteries, such as lightweight cells and energy-dense batteries, but they still face manufacturing process hurdles. The EV market and EV technology continue to grow, and lithium-sulfur batteries could play a significant role in powering electric cars and transport. The aerospace sector, including satellites, unmanned aerial vehicles, and defense applications, could also benefit from the advantages of lithium-sulfur batteries. The energy storage market, including renewable energy installations, portable electronic devices, and personalized power, is expected to grow significantly, and lithium-sulfur batteries could be a key player. However, lithium-sulfur batteries face challenges such as lithium dendrite formation, volume expansion, and conductivity. Prior generations of these batteries had low energy density, but recent advancements have led to high energy density batteries. The manufacturing process for lithium-sulfur batteries requires careful management of plants and production energy, and melting processes are being explored to improve efficiency. The environmental impact of battery manufacturing is a concern, with manganese, nickel, and cobalt being major components of lithium-ion batteries. Lithium-sulfur batteries could offer a more sustainable alternative, as they do not require these minerals in the same quantities. The Theron, a German battery startup, is working on power cell applications for lithium-sulfur batteries, and other companies are exploring the potential of these batteries for various applications, from EVs to aerospace and consumer electronics. In conclusion, lithium-sulfur batteries offer significant potential for clean energy solutions, particularly in the areas of EVs, aerospace, and large-scale energy storage. However, challenges such as electrolyte stability, electrode architecture, and manufacturing processes must be addressed to realize their full potential. The advantages of these batteries, including high energy density, lightweight cells, and reduced reliance on minerals like manganese, nickel, and cobalt, make them an exciting area of research and development.

Table of Contents:

1 Executive Summary
2 Market Landscape
3 Market Sizing
4 Historic Market Size
5 Five Forces Analysis
6 Market Segmentation

TypeHigh Energy DensityLow Energy DensityEnd-userAviationAutomotiveOthersGeographyNorth AmericaEuropeAPACSouth AmericaMiddle East And Africa

7 Customer Landscape
8 Geographic Landscape
9 Drivers, Challenges, and Trends
10 Company Landscape
11 Company Analysis
12 Appendix

About Technavio

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focuses on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions.

With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavio’s report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavio’s comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Contacts

Technavio Research
Jesse Maida
Media & Marketing Executive
US: +1 844 364 1100
UK: +44 203 893 3200
Email: media@technavio.com
Website: www.technavio.com/

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lithium-sulfur-battery-market-size-is-set-to-grow-by-usd-3-92-billion-from-2024-2028–harmful-usage-of-lead-batteries-leads-to-higher-adoption-of-li-s-batteries-boost-the-market-technavio-302189029.html

SOURCE Technavio

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

SandboxAQ Publishes Scientific and Technical Milestones for Cybersecurity

Published

on

By

– A NIST Standard for the PQC Transition: FIPS 205
– 18 peer-reviewed Publications in Cryptography, one of them best paper at Asiacrypt
– Our candidate at the NIST PQC Standardisation for Additional Signatures moves to
the second round!

PALO ALTO, Calif., Jan. 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — SandboxAQ today announced a series of scientific and technical milestones on Cybersecurity, collectively marking a set of significant advances in the company’s core research and product development activities. 

This has been a great year for Cybersecurity at SandboxAQ with 18 publications, raising to 45 the total number of cybersecurity peer-reviewed publications since SandboxAQ spun out of Alphabet in 2022. Sixteen of these papers are in flagship conferences.  But we had three other great successes. First, this summer NIST published FIPS 205 together with FIPS 203 and 204. The consortium behind this standard, SPHINCS+, was led by our own Andreas Hülsing, from the PQC team in R&D. Second, SDitH was accepted by NIST into the second round of the NIST PQC Standardization for Additional Signature Algorithms. And third, one of our papers obtained the best paper award in Asiacrypt, one of the three major conferences in cryptography!

“SandboxAQ’s work in advancing the scientific literature around Post Quantum Cryptography, combined with their global efforts in the related standards, are essential in helping the community prepare for the quantum threat.” Mike Brown, CEO, Polar Analysis.

But let’s dive into this year’s flagship publications. There are three flagship conferences on cryptography in the world every year (Eurocrypt, Crypto and Asiacrypt), in which the best private and public sector actors in the world scarcely publish more than one or two papers every year. 2024 started extremely well for SandboxAQ with 3 papers accepted at Eurocrypt: one showing significant attacks on one of the candidates for the current NIST Standardization on Additional Post-Quantum Signatures, a second describing the first practically feasible Oblivious Pseudo Random Functions (which are essential for advanced cryptography, e.g. anonymous credentials), and a third on polynomial commitments, an essential ingredient for Zero Knowledge Proofs.

“SandboxAQ has gathered an impressive team of cryptography researchers and engineers that has led to significant success. Beyond building an exciting cryptography discovery tool, in a short time they have made major contributions to the design and standardization of new cryptographic algorithms and protocols, with many excellent papers on advanced cryptography and digital signatures in top-tier academic publications.” Douglas Stebila, Associate Professor of cryptography, University of Waterloo, Canada.

Mid-year we learnt that once again we had made it, we had three papers at Crypto: one on a formally-verified implementation of FIPS 203 which gives very strong guarantees on the correct implementation of this essential standard for PQC, a second on the evaluation of quantum attacks against lattices, one of the main domains PQC relies on, and a third on the security of SDitH, our NIST candidate discussed above.

“We are extremely glad our candidate made it to the second round of the NIST Standardisation for Additional PQC Signatures, especially as this comes on top of the publication of FIPS 205 and of many scientific results this year. We do hope our algorithms will help companies and governments across the world on the PQC transition.”, Carlos Aguilar Melchor, Chief Scientist, Cybersecurity, SandboxAQ.

This autumn, once again we received great news with three extra papers accepted at the last flagship conference of the year, Asiacrypt: one (best paper award) on making Fully Homomorphic Encryption, a fundamental tool for privacy, faster, a second on Oblivious Pseudo Random Functions for Threshold Cryptography (e.g. as used in crypto-currency wallets), and a third on the formal verification of the proof of FIPS 205.

About SandboxAQ
‍SandboxAQ is a B2B company delivering AI solutions that address some of the world’s greatest challenges. The company’s Large Quantitative Models (LQMs) deliver critical advances in life sciences, financial services, navigation, cyber and other sectors. The company emerged from Alphabet Inc. as an independent, growth capital-backed company in 2022, funded by leading investors including T. Rowe Price, Eric Schmidt, Breyer Capital, Guggenheim Partners, Marc Benioff, Thomas Tull, Section32, and others. For more information, visit http://www.sandboxaq.com.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sandboxaq-publishes-scientific-and-technical-milestones-for-cybersecurity-302341631.html

SOURCE SandboxAQ

Continue Reading

Technology

Manufacturing PMI® at 49.3%; December 2024 Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®

Published

on

By

New Orders Growing and Backlogs Contracting; Production Growing and Employment Contracting; Supplier Deliveries Slowing; Raw Materials Inventories Contracting; Customers’ Inventories Too Low; Prices Increasing; Exports Unchanged and Imports Contracting

TEMPE, Ariz., Jan. 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Economic activity in the manufacturing sector contracted in December for the ninth consecutive month and the 25th time in the last 26 months, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Timothy R. Fiore, CPSM, C.P.M., Chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee:

“The Manufacturing PMI® registered 49.3 percent in December, 0.9 percentage point higher compared to the 48.4 percent recorded in November. The overall economy continued in expansion for the 56th month after one month of contraction in April 2020. (A Manufacturing PMI® above 42.5 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy.) The New Orders Index continued in expansion territory for the second month after seven months of contraction, strengthening to 52.5 percent, 2.1 percentage points higher than the 50.4 percent recorded in November. The December reading of the Production Index (50.3 percent) is 3.5 percentage points higher than November’s figure of 46.8 percent. The index returned to expansion after six months in contraction. The Prices Index continued in expansion (or ‘increasing’) territory, registering 52.5 percent, up 2.2 percentage points compared to the reading of 50.3 percent in November. The Backlog of Orders Index registered 45.9 percent, up 4.1 percentage points compared to the 41.8 percent recorded in November. The Employment Index registered 45.3 percent, down 2.8 percentage points from November’s figure of 48.1 percent.

“The Supplier Deliveries Index indicated marginally slower deliveries, registering 50.1 percent, 1.4 percentage points higher than the 48.7 percent recorded in November. (Supplier Deliveries is the only ISM® Report On Business® index that is inversed; a reading of above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries, which is typical as the economy improves and customer demand increases.) The Inventories Index registered 48.4 percent, up 0.3 percentage point compared to November’s reading of 48.1 percent.

“The New Export Orders Index’s ‘unchanged’ reading of 50 percent is 1.3 percentage points higher than the 48.7 percent registered in November. The Imports Index remained in contraction territory in December, registering 49.7 percent, 2.1 percentage points higher than November’s reading of 47.6 percent.”

Fiore continues, “U.S. manufacturing activity contracted again in December, but at a slower rate compared to November. Demand showed signs of improving, while output stabilized and inputs stayed accommodative. Demand analysis includes: the (1) New Orders Index remaining in expansion territory, (2) New Export Orders Index increasing (up 1.3 percentage points and now ‘unchanged’), (3) Backlog of Orders Index slowing its rate of decline but continuing in contraction territory, and (4) Customers’ Inventories Index dropping into ‘too low’ territory. Output (measured by the Production and Employment indexes) was positive; factory output stabilized compared to November, indicating that panelists’ companies are executing to plan. Employment contracted as final head-count adjustments were likely taken to prepare for 2025. Inputs — defined as supplier deliveries, inventories, prices and imports — generally continued to accommodate future demand growth, with inventories and imports improving marginally (though remaining in contraction), prices increasing and supplier deliveries marginally slowing.

“Demand improved, production execution met November’s performance (and companies’ plans), de-staffing continued (but should end soon), and price growth was marginal. Fifty-two percent of manufacturing gross domestic product (GDP) contracted in December, down from 66 percent in November. The share of manufacturing sector GDP registering a composite PMI® calculation at or below 45 percent (a good barometer of overall manufacturing weakness) was 49 percent in December, a 1-percentage point increase compared to the 48 percent reported in November. None of the six largest manufacturing industries expanded in December, down from two in November,” says Fiore.

The seven manufacturing industries reporting growth in December — listed in order — are: Primary Metals; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Wood Products; Furniture & Related Products; Paper Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; and Plastics & Rubber Products. The seven industries reporting contraction in December — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Fabricated Metal Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Machinery; Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment; and Nonmetallic Mineral Products.

WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING

“Slightly lower due to seasonality and end-of-year destocking.” [Chemical Products]”Automotive and powersport volume decreases.” [Transportation Equipment]”We are seeing a softening in sales. This is concerning as it’s our peak season.” [Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products]”We are constrained by technical labor, despite higher-than-normal backlog.” [Computer & Electronic Products]”Significant slowdown in production requirements in the last two months of the year.” [Machinery]”Order levels well below forecast projections.” [Fabricated Metal Products]”The increase in new orders has our plant at full capacity.” [Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components]”Combo of seasonal factors plus increased demand outlook for 2025.” [Miscellaneous Manufacturing]”There is definitely an uptick this month, though not a stable one.” [Primary Metals]”The orders have increased slightly due to seasonal restocking.” [Plastics & Rubber Products]

MANUFACTURING AT A GLANCE
December 2024

Index

Series
Index

Dec

Series
Index

Nov

Percentage

Point

Change

Direction

Rate of
Change

Trend*
(Months)

Manufacturing PMI®

49.3

48.4

+0.9

Contracting

Slower

9

New Orders

52.5

50.4

+2.1

Growing

Faster

2

Production

50.3

46.8

+3.5

Growing

From
Contracting

1

Employment

45.3

48.1

-2.8

Contracting

Faster

7

Supplier Deliveries

50.1

48.7

+1.4

Slowing

From Faster

1

Inventories

48.4

48.1

+0.3

Contracting

Slower

4

Customers’ Inventories

46.7

48.4

-1.7

Too Low

Faster

3

Prices

52.5

50.3

+2.2

Increasing

Faster

3

Backlog of Orders

45.9

41.8

+4.1

Contracting

Slower

27

New Export Orders

50.0

48.7

+1.3

Unchanged

From
Contracting

1

Imports

49.7

47.6

+2.1

Contracting

Slower

7

OVERALL ECONOMY

Growing

Faster

56

Manufacturing Sector

Contracting

Slower

9

Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® data is seasonally adjusted for the New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories indexes.

*Number of months moving in current direction.

COMMODITIES REPORTED UP/DOWN IN PRICE AND IN SHORT SUPPLY

Commodities Up in Price
Aluminum (13); Caustic Soda (2); Copper (3); Electronic Components; Labor — Temporary; Methanol; Natural Gas (3); Packaging Materials; Steel — General*; Steel — High Carbon; and Steel-Making Elements*.

Commodities Down in Price
Diesel Fuel (2); Plastic Resin (2); Polypropylene Resin; Solvents (2); Steel — General*; Steel — Hot Rolled (2); Steel — Scrap; and Steel-Making Elements*.

Commodities in Short Supply
Electrical Components (51); Electronic Components (9); and Labor — Construction Services and Skilled.

Note: The number of consecutive months the commodity is listed is indicated after each item.

*Indicates both up and down in price.

DECEMBER 2024 MANUFACTURING INDEX SUMMARIES

Manufacturing PMI®
The U.S. manufacturing sector contracted for the ninth consecutive month in December, as the Manufacturing PMI® registered 49.3 percent, 0.9 percentage point higher compared to the 48.4 percent reported in November. “After breaking a 16-month streak of contraction by expanding in March, the manufacturing sector has contracted for the last nine months. Of the five subindexes that directly factor into the Manufacturing PMI®, three (New Orders, Production and Supplier Deliveries) were in expansion territory, compared to only one in November. The Employment Index remained in contraction, but the New Orders Index moved further into expansion in December. Of the six biggest manufacturing industries, none registered growth,” says Fiore. A reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing sector is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally contracting.

A Manufacturing PMI® above 42.5 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy. Therefore, the December Manufacturing PMI® indicates the overall economy grew for the 56th straight month after last contracting in April 2020. “The past relationship between the Manufacturing PMI® and the overall economy indicates that the December reading (49.3 percent) corresponds to a change of plus-1.9 percent in real gross domestic product (GDP) on an annualized basis,” says Fiore.

THE LAST 12 MONTHS

Month

Manufacturing
PMI®

Month

Manufacturing
PMI®

Dec 2024

49.3

Jun 2024

48.5

Nov 2024

48.4

May 2024

48.7

Oct 2024

46.5

Apr 2024

49.2

Sep 2024

47.2

Mar 2024

50.3

Aug 2024

47.2

Feb 2024

47.8

Jul 2024

46.8

Jan 2024

49.1

Average for 12 months – 48.3

High – 50.3

Low – 46.5

New Orders
ISM®’s New Orders Index expanded in December for the second consecutive month after seven months in contraction, registering 52.5 percent, an increase of 2.1 percentage points compared to November’s figure of 50.4 percent. The New Orders Index hasn’t indicated consistent growth since a 24-month streak of expansion ended in May 2022. “Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, two (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Computer & Electronic Products) reported increased new orders. Panelists noted an improved level of demand performance, with a 1.5-to-1 ratio of positive comments versus those expressing concern about near-term demand, an improvement compared to November,” says Fiore. A New Orders Index above 52.3 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Census Bureau’s series on manufacturing orders (in constant 2000 dollars).

The six manufacturing industries that reported growth in new orders in December, in order, are: Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Paper Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Primary Metals; and Computer & Electronic Products. The eight industries reporting a decline in new orders in December — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Printing & Related Support Activities; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Wood Products; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Machinery.

New Orders

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

21.0

54.9

24.1

-3.1

52.5

Nov 2024

21.0

54.3

24.7

-3.7

50.4

Oct 2024

20.4

50.6

29.0

-8.6

47.1

Sep 2024

17.6

56.1

26.3

-8.7

46.1

Production
The Production Index emerged into expansion territory in December, registering 50.3 percent, 3.5 percentage points higher than the November reading of 46.8 percent. Prior to this month’s reading, the index was in contraction territory for six consecutive months. The last time the index registered above 50 percent was in May (50.2 percent). Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, only one (Computer & Electronic Products) reported increased production. “Production levels were stable to November’s performance, indicating that re-planning factory floor activity has likely been completed, head counts are likely synchronized with factory demand, and panelists are fully staffed and aligned for 2025,” says Fiore. An index above 52.2 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Federal Reserve Board’s Industrial Production figures.

The five industries reporting growth in production during the month of December are: Textile Mills; Plastics & Rubber Products; Wood Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Primary Metals. The six industries reporting a decrease in production in December, in order, are: Printing & Related Support Activities; Fabricated Metal Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Machinery; Chemical Products; and Transportation Equipment. Six industries reported no change in production levels in December as compared to November.

Production

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

15.3

59.3

25.4

-10.1

50.3

Nov 2024

15.9

63.2

20.9

-5.0

46.8

Oct 2024

16.8

59.3

23.9

-7.1

46.2

Sep 2024

17.6

60.7

21.7

-4.1

49.8

Employment
ISM®’s Employment Index registered 45.3 percent in December, 2.8 percentage points lower than the November reading of 48.1 percent. “The index contracted for the seventh consecutive month and the 14th out of the last 15 months. Of the six big manufacturing sectors, none expanded employment in December. Respondents’ companies are continuing to reduce head counts through layoffs, attrition and hiring freezes. This action is supported in December by the approximately 1-to-2 ratio of hiring versus staff-reduction comments, compared to a 1-to-1.5 ratio the previous month, meaning more workforce reduction activity is occurring as we close 2025,” says Fiore. An Employment Index above 50.3 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.

Of 18 manufacturing industries, the two industries reporting employment growth in December are: Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Plastics & Rubber Products. The nine industries reporting a decrease in employment in December, in the following order, are: Textile Mills; Fabricated Metal Products; Machinery; Chemical Products; Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Primary Metals; Transportation Equipment; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. Six industries reported no change in employment levels in December as compared to November.

Employment

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

7.0

75.3

17.7

-10.7

45.3

Nov 2024

14.2

65.3

20.5

-6.3

48.1

Oct 2024

9.0

70.6

20.4

-11.4

44.4

Sep 2024

8.0

69.3

22.7

-14.7

43.9

Supplier Deliveries†
Delivery performance of suppliers to manufacturing organizations was marginally slower in December, with the Supplier Deliveries Index registering 50.1 percent, a 1.4-percentage point increase compared to the reading of 48.7 percent reported in November. This expansion follows a contraction in November preceded by four consecutive months of slower deliveries, with four straight months of faster deliveries before that. After a reading of 52.4 percent in September 2022, the index went into contraction territory the following month and remained there for 20 out of 21 months (with February 2024 as the exception). Of the six big industries, two (Computer & Electronic Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products) reported slower supplier deliveries in December. “Supplier deliveries moved into ‘slower’ territory as supplier delivery performance continues to meet the expectations of panelists’ customers,” says Fiore. A reading below 50 percent indicates faster deliveries, while a reading above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries.

The six manufacturing industries reporting slower supplier deliveries in December — listed in order — are: Furniture & Related Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products. The three industries reporting faster supplier deliveries in December are: Fabricated Metal Products; Chemical Products; and Machinery. Eight industries reported no change in supplier deliveries in December as compared to November.

Supplier Deliveries

%Slower

%Same

%Faster

Net

Index

Dec 2024

6.4

87.4

6.2

+0.2

50.1

Nov 2024

5.7

86.0

8.3

-2.6

48.7

Oct 2024

11.9

80.1

8.0

+3.9

52.0

Sep 2024

10.4

83.6

6.0

+4.4

52.2

Inventories
The Inventories Index registered 48.4 percent in December, up 0.3 percentage point compared to the reading of 48.1 percent reported in November. The last time the Inventories Index registered above 50 percent was in August, when it registered 50.3 percent. “Manufacturing inventories continue to contract, though rates have slowed in in the last two months as panelists continue to manage working capital. This month’s index reading indicating a slowing rate of contraction suggests that companies are willing to invest more for the future, to (1) better perform to their customers’ delivery demands or (2) advance material deliveries to avoid potential tariffs, or a combination of both. Of the six big industries, none reported expanding manufacturing inventories in December,” says Fiore. An Inventories Index greater than 44.4 percent, over time, is generally consistent with expansion in the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) figures on overall manufacturing inventories (in chained 2000 dollars).

Of 18 manufacturing industries, the five industries reporting higher inventories in December are: Primary Metals; Wood Products; Furniture & Related Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; and Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components. The eight industries reporting lower inventories in December — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Fabricated Metal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Chemical Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; and Transportation Equipment.

Inventories

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

14.4

64.8

20.8

-6.4

48.4

Nov 2024

15.5

63.2

21.3

-5.8

48.1

Oct 2024

14.2

59.1

26.7

-12.5

42.6

Sep 2024

11.2

66.5

22.3

-11.1

43.9

Customers’ Inventories†
ISM®’s Customers’ Inventories Index registered a reading of 46.7 percent in December, down 1.7 percentage points compared to the 48.4 percent reported in November. “Customers’ inventory levels in December have dropped to the high side of ‘too low.’ Panelists are reporting that the amounts of their products in their customers’ inventories suggest a demand level that is positive for future production,” says Fiore.

The four industries reporting customers’ inventories as too high in December are: Textile Mills; Wood Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. The 10 industries reporting customers’ inventories as too low in December, in order, are: Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Paper Products; Furniture & Related Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Machinery; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; and Chemical Products.

Customers’
Inventories

%
Reporting

%Too
High

%About
Right

%Too
Low

Net

Index

Dec 2024

78

11.5

70.3

18.2

-6.7

46.7

Nov 2024

77

10.6

75.5

13.9

-3.3

48.4

Oct 2024

80

12.2

69.1

18.7

-6.5

46.8

Sep 2024

76

13.2

73.6

13.2

0.0

50.0

Prices†
The ISM® Prices Index registered 52.5 percent, 2.2 percentage points higher compared to the November reading of 50.3 percent, indicating raw materials prices increased for the third straight month in December after a decrease in September. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, three — Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; and Computer & Electronic Products — reported price increases in December. “The Prices Index indicated increasing prices in December for the third consecutive month, but at weak rates. Aluminum, basic chemicals, copper and natural gas registered increases, offset by steel, plastic resins and diesel fuel moving down in price. Fourteen percent of companies reported higher prices in December, compared to 12 percent in November,” says Fiore. A Prices Index above 52.8 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials.

In December, the seven industries that reported paying increased prices for raw materials, in order, are: Primary Metals; Wood Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; and Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components. The three industries report paying decreased prices for raw materials in December are: Plastics & Rubber Products; Chemical Products; and Fabricated Metal Products. Seven industries reported no change in prices in December as compared to November.


Prices

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

14.4

76.1

9.5

+4.9

52.5

Nov 2024

12.2

76.1

11.7

+0.5

50.3

Oct 2024

19.8

69.9

10.3

+9.5

54.8

Sep 2024

12.9

70.7

16.4

-3.5

48.3

Backlog of Orders†
ISM®’s Backlog of Orders Index registered 45.9 percent, an increase of 4.1 percentage points compared to the November reading of 41.8 percent, indicating order backlogs contracted for the 27th consecutive month after a 27-month period of expansion. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, two (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Computer & Electronic Products) reported expanded order backlogs in December. “In December, the index recorded its best performance since April 2024 (45.4 percent), as new orders coupled with stable production levels slowed the rate of declining backlogs,” says Fiore.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, three reported growth in order backlogs in December: Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components. The 10 industries reporting lower backlogs in December — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Printing & Related Support Activities; Furniture & Related Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Wood Products; Machinery; Transportation Equipment; Chemical Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing.

Backlog of
Orders

%
Reporting

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

91

14.9

62.0

23.1

-8.2

45.9

Nov 2024

92

14.5

54.6

30.9

-16.4

41.8

Oct 2024

93

14.1

56.4

29.5

-15.4

42.3

Sep 2024

92

14.5

59.1

26.4

-11.9

44.1

New Export Orders†
ISM®’s New Export Orders Index registered an “unchanged” reading of 50 percent in December, up 1.3 percentage points from November’s reading of 48.7 percent. “The New Export Orders Index reading indicates that export orders were ‘unchanged’ from last month, following six straight months of contraction. New export orders stabilized this month as international trading partners are showing signs of demand recovery as we enter 2025,” says Fiore.

The four industries reporting growth in new export orders in December are: Plastics & Rubber Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. The four industries reporting a decrease in new export orders in December are: Primary Metals; Transportation Equipment; Machinery; and Chemical Products. Eight industries reported no change in exports in December.

New Export
Orders

%
Reporting

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

74

10.9

78.2

10.9

0.0

50.0

Nov 2024

75

10.6

76.1

13.3

-2.7

48.7

Oct 2024

74

7.7

75.6

16.7

-9.0

45.5

Sep 2024

73

7.2

76.1

16.7

-9.5

45.3

Imports†
ISM®’s Imports Index continued to indicate cooling in December; the reading of 49.7 percent is 2.1 percentage points higher compared to the reading of 47.6 reported in November. “Imports contracted for the seventh month in a row after five consecutive months of expansion, preceded by 14 consecutive months of contraction. Imports moved closer to growth as inventory constraints weaken and panelists act to better absorb any potential tariff impact in the future,” says Fiore.

The seven industries reporting an increase in import volumes in December, in order, are: Wood Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Computer & Electronic Products. The five industries that reported lower volumes of imports in December are: Paper Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Primary Metals; Transportation Equipment; and Fabricated Metal Products.

Imports

%
Reporting

%Higher

%Same

%Lower

Net

Index

Dec 2024

85

12.8

73.8

13.4

-0.6

49.7

Nov 2024

83

10.2

74.8

15.0

-4.8

47.6

Oct 2024

84

11.7

73.1

15.2

-3.5

48.3

Sep 2024

82

10.2

76.2

13.6

-3.4

48.3

†The Supplier Deliveries, Customers’ Inventories, Prices, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, and Imports indexes do not meet the accepted criteria for seasonal adjustments.

Buying Policy
The average commitment lead time for Capital Expenditures in December was 175 days, an increase of five days compared to November. Average lead time in December for Production Materials was 81 days, an increase of two days compared to November. Average lead time for Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies was 46 days, an increase of two days compared to November.

Percent Reporting

Capital
Expenditures

Hand-to-
Mouth

30 Days

60 Days

90 Days

6 Months

1 Year+

Average
Days

Dec 2024

14

5

8

15

30

28

175

Nov 2024

16

4

9

15

29

27

170

Oct 2024

16

5

12

12

28

27

168

Sep 2024

16

3

10

13

30

28

174

 

Percent Reporting

Production
Materials

Hand-to-
Mouth

30 Days

60 Days

90 Days

6 Months

1 Year+

Average
Days

Dec 2024

7

25

28

27

8

5

81

Nov 2024

8

24

28

27

9

4

79

Oct 2024

9

25

26

26

9

5

81

Sep 2024

7

26

28

27

7

5

80

 

Percent Reporting

MRO Supplies

Hand-to-
Mouth

30 Days

60 Days

90 Days

6 Months

1 Year+

Average
Days

Dec 2024

30

35

16

13

5

1

46

Nov 2024

30

34

17

13

6

0

44

Oct 2024

30

34

18

12

5

1

46

Sep 2024

27

37

19

11

5

1

46

About This Report
DO NOT CONFUSE THIS NATIONAL REPORT with the various regional purchasing reports released across the country. The national report’s information reflects the entire U.S., while the regional reports contain primarily regional data from their local vicinities. Also, the information in the regional reports is not used in calculating the results of the national report. The information compiled in this report is for the month of December 2024.

The data presented herein is obtained from a survey of manufacturing supply executives based on information they have collected within their respective organizations. ISM® makes no representation, other than that stated within this release, regarding the individual company data collection procedures. The data should be compared to all other economic data sources when used in decision-making.

Data and Method of Presentation
The Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® is based on data compiled from purchasing and supply executives nationwide. The composition of the Manufacturing Business Survey Committee is stratified according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and each of the following NAICS-based industries’ contribution to gross domestic product (GDP): Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Textile Mills; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Wood Products; Paper Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Petroleum & Coal Products; Chemical Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Fabricated Metal Products; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Furniture & Related Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing (products such as medical equipment and supplies, jewelry, sporting goods, toys and office supplies). The data is weighted based on each industry’s contribution to GDP. According to BEA estimates (the average of the fourth quarter 2022 GDP estimate and the GDP estimates for first, second, and third quarter 2023, as released on December 21, 2023), the six largest manufacturing industries are: Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Machinery; and Fabricated Metal Products.

Survey responses reflect the change, if any, in the current month compared to the previous month. For nine indicators (New Orders, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, Imports, Production, Supplier Deliveries, Inventories, Employment, and Prices), this report shows the percentage reporting each response, the net difference between the number of responses in the positive economic direction (higher, better and slower for Supplier Deliveries) and the negative economic direction (lower, worse and faster for Supplier Deliveries), and the diffusion index. For Customers’ Inventories, respondents report their assessment of their customers’ stock levels of respondent companies’ products this month (rather than last month): too high, about right, and too low. Responses are raw data and are never changed. The diffusion index includes the percent of positive responses plus one-half of those responding the same (considered positive).

The resulting single index number for those meeting the criteria for seasonal adjustments (Manufacturing PMI®, New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories) is then seasonally adjusted to allow for the effects of repetitive intra-year variations resulting primarily from normal differences in weather conditions, various institutional arrangements, and differences attributable to non-moveable holidays. All seasonal adjustment factors are subject annually to relatively minor changes when conditions warrant them. The Manufacturing PMI® is a composite index based on the diffusion indexes of five of the indexes with equal weights: New Orders (seasonally adjusted), Production (seasonally adjusted), Employment (seasonally adjusted), Supplier Deliveries, and Inventories (seasonally adjusted).

Diffusion indexes have the properties of leading indicators and are convenient summary measures showing the prevailing direction of change and the scope of change. A Manufacturing PMI® reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally declining. A Manufacturing PMI® above 42.5 percent, over a period of time, indicates that the overall economy, or gross domestic product (GDP), is generally expanding; below 42.5 percent, it is generally declining. The distance from 50 percent or 42.5 percent is indicative of the extent of the expansion or decline. With some of the indicators within this report, ISM® has indicated the departure point between expansion and decline of comparable government series, as determined by regression analysis. For the Customers’ Inventories Index, numerically, a reading: above 50 percent is “too high,” equal to 50 percent is “about right,” and below 50 percent is “too low.” However, in practice and in the context of other data, customers’ inventories may be considered to be “about right” if the diffusion index is between 52 percent (the high side of about right) and 48 percent (the low side of about right).

The Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® survey is sent out to Manufacturing Business Survey Committee respondents the first part of each month. Respondents are asked to report on information for the current month for U.S. operations only. ISM® receives survey responses throughout most of any given month, with the majority of respondents generally waiting until late in the month to submit responses to give the most accurate picture of current business activity. ISM® then compiles the report for release on the first business day of the following month.

The industries reporting growth, as indicated in the Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® monthly report, are listed in the order of most growth to least growth. For the industries reporting contraction or decreases, those are listed in the order of the highest level of contraction/decrease to the least level of contraction/decrease.

Responses to Buying Policy reflect the percent reporting the current month’s lead time, the approximate weighted number of days ahead for which commitments are made for Capital Expenditures; Production Materials; and Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies, expressed as hand-to-mouth (five days), 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months (180 days), a year or more (360 days), and the weighted average number of days. These responses are raw data, never revised, and not seasonally adjusted.

ISM ROB Content
The Institute for Supply Management® (“ISM”) Report On Business® (both Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing) (“ISM ROB”) contains information, text, files, images, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, applications, and any other materials or content (collectively, “Content”) of ISM (“ISM ROB Content”). ISM ROB Content is protected by copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other laws, and as between you and ISM, ISM owns and retains all rights in the ISM ROB Content. ISM hereby grants you a limited, revocable, nonsublicensable license to access and display on your individual device the ISM ROB Content (excluding any software code) solely for your personal, non-commercial use. The ISM ROB Content shall also contain Content of users and other ISM licensors. Except as provided herein or as explicitly allowed in writing by ISM, you shall not copy, download, stream, capture, reproduce, duplicate, archive, upload, modify, translate, publish, broadcast, transmit, retransmit, distribute, perform, display, sell, or otherwise use any ISM ROB Content.

Except as explicitly and expressly permitted by ISM, you are strictly prohibited from creating works or materials (including but not limited to tables, charts, data streams, time-series variables, fonts, icons, link buttons, wallpaper, desktop themes, online postcards, montages, mashups and similar videos, greeting cards, and unlicensed merchandise) that derive from or are based on the ISM ROB Content. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the derivative works or materials are sold, bartered, or given away. You shall not either directly or through the use of any device, software, internet site, web-based service, or other means remove, alter, bypass, avoid, interfere with, or circumvent any copyright, trademark, or other proprietary notices marked on the Content or any digital rights management mechanism, device, or other content protection or access control measure associated with the Content including geo-filtering mechanisms. Without prior written authorization from ISM, you shall not build a business utilizing the Content, whether or not for profit.

You shall not create, recreate, distribute, incorporate in other work, or advertise an index of any portion of the Content unless you receive prior written authorization from ISM. Requests for permission to reproduce or distribute ISM ROB Content can be made by contacting in writing at: ISM Research, Institute for Supply Management, 309 West Elliot Road, Suite 113, Tempe, Arizona 85284-1556, or by emailing kcahill@ismworld.org. Subject: Content Request.

ISM shall not have any liability, duty, or obligation for or relating to the ISM ROB Content or other information contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in providing any ISM ROB Content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. In no event shall ISM be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use of the ISM ROB. Report On Business®, PMI®, Manufacturing PMI®, Services PMI®, Hospital PMI®, and NMI® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management®. Institute for Supply Management® and ISM® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management, Inc.

About Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®)
Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) is the first and leading not-for-profit professional supply management organization worldwide. Its community of more than 50,000 in more than 100 countries manages about US$1 trillion in corporate and government supply chain procurement annually. Founded in 1915 by practitioners, ISM is committed to advancing the practice of supply management to drive value and competitive advantage for its members, contributing to a prosperous and sustainable world. ISM empowers and leads the profession through the ISM® Report On Business®, its highly regarded certification and training programs, corporate services, events and assessments. The ISM® Report On Business®, Manufacturing, Services, and Hospital, are three of the most reliable economic indicators available, providing guidance to supply management professionals, economists, analysts, and government and business leaders. For more information, please visit: www.ismworld.org.

The full text version of the Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® is posted on ISM®’s website at www.ismrob.org on the first business day* of every month after 10:00 a.m. ET. The one exception is in January when the report is released on the second business day of the month.

The next Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® featuring January 2025 data will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET on Monday, February 3, 2025.

*Unless the New York Stock Exchange is closed.

Contact:

Kristina Cahill 

Report On Business® Analyst

ISM®, ROB/Research Manager

Tempe, Arizona

+1 480.455.5910

Email: kcahill@ismworld.org

 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/manufacturing-pmi-at-49-3-december-2024-manufacturing-ism-report-on-business-302341381.html

SOURCE Institute for Supply Management

Continue Reading

Technology

Bailey Equipment & Intralogistics Announces 2024 Equipment Giving Program Winner

Published

on

By

Christian Appalachian Project Selected to Receive Essential Warehouse Equipment

NASHVILLE, Tenn., Jan. 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Bailey Equipment & Intralogistics, a trusted family- and woman-owned business since 1949, proudly announces the Christian Appalachian Project as the recipient of this year’s Equipment Giving Program. This initiative highlights Bailey’s dedication to empowering nonprofits and strengthening local communities through tangible operational support.

The Christian Appalachian Project (CAP), based in Eastern Kentucky, has been transforming lives across the Appalachian region for over 50 years. CAP provides critical support to families in need through programs such as disaster relief, hunger prevention, home repair, and youth services.

The awarded Electric Walkie Pallet Truck will directly enhance CAP’s operational efficiency, particularly in their warehouses, ensuring smoother handling and distribution of essential supplies to families and individuals facing hardship in Appalachia.

Ryan Bailey, President of Bailey Equipment & Intralogistics, stated: “Nonprofits like the Christian Appalachian Project are a testament to the power of community and compassion. We’re honored to provide equipment that helps amplify their impact, making their operations easier and their reach greater.”

Ben Ridner, Manager of (CAP’s) Operation Sharing Program, expressed gratitude: “We are so thankful for the support of Bailey. We have had many years of service and partnership with your organization, with great service and a friendly staff that has always been there for us. You have always made sure our equipment is up to date and in good working order. We serve around 1.8 million people each year, with about 1500 partners that help along the way. Bailey is at the top of the list when it comes to support. The electric pallet jack donation will allow us to better serve more people in the 15 states that we cover across the Appalachian Region. Christian Appalachian Project wants to give everyone at the Bailey a special thanks for the years of service, support, and this year’s donation. Thank You!”

About the Equipment Giving Program
Since its inception, Bailey’s Equipment Giving Program has empowered nonprofit organizations by providing state-of-the-art material handling solutions. Past winners have experienced transformative results in their day-to-day operations, reinforcing Bailey’s commitment to helping nonprofits operate safely and efficiently.

Applications for the next Equipment Giving Program open on August 17th, 2025, with a deadline of November 1st, 2025. Eligible nonprofits are encouraged to apply for the chance to win an Electric Walkie Pallet Truck.

About Bailey Equipment & Intralogistics
Founded in 1949, Bailey is a premier provider of comprehensive material handling solutions across Tennessee, northern Georgia, and southeastern Kentucky. As the nation’s first TRUE Zero Waste forklift dealership, Bailey’s commitment extends to sustainability, community involvement, and operational excellence. For more information, visit https://baileycompany.com/.

Media Contact
Jenna Roberts
Email: jroberts@baileycompany.com
Phone: (651) 242-0351

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bailey-equipment–intralogistics-announces-2024-equipment-giving-program-winner-302341359.html

SOURCE The Bailey Company

Continue Reading

Trending